What the Constitution did, was to state that the People have certain Unalienable Rights based on Common Law. If party A offers a service or benefit, and party B accepts, does party B not owe party A? Usually stated as a contract, in the conditions of acceptance? So if you happen to hold your hand out for a Government benefit, and accept it, is it free? Or does it come with a whole bunch of conditions? It is the actions that make the contract, what is on paper is merely the statement. Consideration is the exchange of goods, services, money, value, or other Lawful property. A contract needs party A, party B, and an exchange of consideration. What is on paper, is the statement of the contract. The Constitution was not a contract between the People and their Representatives, it was the statement of the contract. Pursuant to the Constitution, the federal “United States” has no jurisdiction outside of the 63 miles of the District of Columbia, or any unincorporated territories purchased by treaty except where jurisdiction has been extended by contract.” – Johnny Liberty “ Remember that the federal “United States” was created and limited by the authority and power vested in the Constitution. cannot be transferred to another or surrendered except by individual choice and contract the opposite of “inalienable” rights, or “civil” rights which are conferred by statutory law and by government permission and privilege cannot be liened against.” – Johnny Liberty Un-a-lien-able: “fundamental rights secured by Natural Law that cannot be taken away, including the right to practice your religion of choice, the freedom of speech, right to travel, eat, sleep, etc. It can be denied in the mind, but not in the flesh. Without your consent and participation, the Federal Government doesn’t exist, but the Republic still does. By deduction, the rules of other men cannot exist without the participation of those who follow the rules. It is not possible to escape Common Law, however it is possible to escape the rules created by others. Hence compos mentis – composure of the mind as with government – control of the mind.” – GSF SystemĬicero once said that all men need to decide whether they get their laws from God or Nature, or from other men. “The root of the ‘ment’ part of government is mentis – the mind in latin. “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.” – Albert Einstein To fully understand the reality that Gary is trying to show us we need to open up our minds, for most of us have been told to think that this reality is not possible, or does not exist. Benson takes a close look at the 16 th Amendment and the nature of the IRS and Income Tax Acts, which are voluntary contracts. The author was a mentor of Roger Sayles, and both of them have spent mountains of time and energy to research the Common Law history of America the Republic and the feudal history of the current Federal Government. The third post was a review of another book, Taxation by Misrepresentation, by John W.
#INVISIBLE CONTRACTS MERCIER FREE#
The meaning of Republic came from the words “Libera Res Publica” which means, free from things Public, or free from Majority Rule. The original King James bible provides us with a mountain of Common Law basics, including the Ten Commandments, which can be reduced to the two Natural Laws which most Austrians are familiar with do no harm, and do all you agree to do. Much of the Common Law that founded many of the Republics of old, was stated in the bible. The second post was the Anarchic Story of Christmas, the story of how Jesus was actually an anarchist. National who is a voluntary non-taxpayer. Citizen who is a voluntary taxpayer, and the U.S. His main point is to raise awareness of two different legal statuses which were created by the 14 th Amendment, the U.S. The book lays out Sayles’ thorough background on this subject matter and then goes on to provide a solution for those who are interested in removing themselves from majority rule. The first post was a review of the book, From Sovereign to Serf, by Roger Sayles. This piece is meant to build on three previous Dollar Vigilante posts written by Gary Kinghorn, relating to the voluntary nature of our level of participation in a corrupt and failing system.
0 kommentar(er)
